Michigan Business Tax Modifications

Well, Governor-Elect Snyder has his work cut out for him.  He is going into one of the harshest environments where the State and Cities, not to mention the Taxpayers are all screaming at the top of their lungs about TAXES.

Moving from the much hated Michigan Business Tax to the New Business Tax is really not that far to go.  The only question is how fast can it get there without derailing the entire State/Cities/Businesses/Taxpayers.

The Michigan Association of CPA’s has assembled a group of state and local tax professionals that can and will assist the Legislature and the Governor and they have extended a request to do just that.

The first step in the process is to assist with the current convoluted MBT system and briefly, those clarifications can be summarized as follows:

  • Treatment of Personal Investment Income – should be same for gross receipts and income tax
  • Self-constructed Assets – should be included in definition of depreciable assets for gross receipts purposes
  • Credit Ordering – Sec 403 and 405 should be before former SBT credits
  • Qualified Research Definitions
  • Local Classification of Industrial Property
  • Expand Intercompany Eliminations for Unitary Business Groups
  • Domestic and Foreign Disregarded Entities
  • Reasonable Return of Capital
  • Definition of Officer
  • Eliminate Liability Remittance Requirement – currently Payment MUST accompany return
  • FAS 109 Deduction – still could end up leaving companies with Permanent Difference if not allowed to correct
  • Sourcing of Sales of Tangible Personal Property – to include First Intended Use
  • Income Base NOL Successorship
  • Materials and Supplies – OMG
  • ITC Recapture
  • COD Income
  • Renaissance Zone Credit – needs removal of prior SBT connection

These are the major ones identified so far.

Come on Rick Snyder – Come on Andy Dillon!!!  Together we are going to pull Michigan up to where it needs to be!

If you would like more information about the proposed changes listed above, check out our website at www.HodgesLLC.com or you can follow us on Twitter at @SamHodgesCPA or you can follow our facebook page or our linked in page.

Posted in Administration, Income/Franchise Tax, Michigan Business Tax, Single Business Tax | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Election is over!!! Well – Almost – Get ready for tax changes

Well, it is finally November 2, and the polls are open still and Michigan taxpayers are waiting with party hats and streamers ready to ring in the new Governor. The real question is – who is it going to be and second, how much change are they really going to make regarding taxes in Michigan.

There is already a list of ‘clarifications’ that should really help taxpayers as the greatly understaffed Department of Treasury weave through the audit mess. These clarifications will only help if and only if they get passed in a bill or series of bills.

Some of the clarifications include but are not limited to:

  • Personal Investment Income – You wanna tax my house???
  • Self Constructed Assets – Deduct or not-to-deduct  that is the question
  • Ordering of Credits – how can you have enough credits to offset all you tax and still have tax due?
  • Credits and Unitary – sometimes they are Unitary and sometimes they are Separate – what gives?
  • Unitary – Indirect – who needs it!
  • and the ever so convoluted  Materials and Supplies plus more

Each and every one of these are areas that are not clear or are not being implemented within the spirit in which they were intended.  Oh, and I forgot the Industrial Personal Property tax credit.  The State has sent out over 10,000 appeals to the Michigan Tax Tribunal in order to change the classification of Industrial to Commercial – hence – NO MBT CREDIT – sorry – nada – and the taxpayer only has a few days to respond or a default judgement will be entered.

WE CAN’T SAY THIS ENOUGH…  If you are located outside of Michigan and you operate a location inside Michigan or just have a sales representative that comes through our state – YOU NEED TO CALL US IMMEDIATELY!!!  There are so many things with the Michigan Business Tax that are not published – only persons here in the thick of things would even recognize and you could be significantly overpaying.  OR WORSE – you could be risking a lot if you don’t file!

You can contact us at www.HodgesLLC.com – we have several tax professionals that can assist you – including former State of Michigan auditors AND the former Michigan Commissioner of Revenue.  Sam

Posted in Michigan Business Tax | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Michigan wants YOU!

If you have received a love letter from the State of Michigan – beware!!!  The Department of Treasury has been looking for you!!!

The Department of Treasury has been asking (and compelling) Michigan Taxpayers who they have been doing business with from outside Michigan.  If that is you and you haven’t been paying attention to the changes that have been taking place in Michigan taxes, you should give us a call.

Discovery has been beefing up their ranks and doing their homework.  They’re doing their job to try to find you before Michigan’s amnesty period begins.  If you got one of those letters identifying you or you received one of the letters asking you to “self audit” yourself for use tax – do yourself a favor and call us fast – before the door closes.  We can help you.

Remember, if you try to go through voluntary disclosure by yourself and make a mistake…  YOU LOSE!!!  You won’t be able to get a refund because you agree to forgo any refund claims if the State will forgo penalties…

There are so many little nuances like these for the State of Michigan that you shouldn’t go it alone.  We are THE ones to help you.  Our members include former State of Michigan auditors and the former Commissioner of Revenue.  We are THE ones to help you.

Our main office number is 248.327.6430.  And we also have offices in Lansing and Grand Rapids to assist you.

Email – Sam.Hodges@HodgesLLC.Com

Web Site – www.HodgesLLC.com

Thank you for your Business and Referrals!  For more information, you can connect with us on Twitter, Linkedin, Blog and our Facebook Page.

Twitter    => Sam Hodges CPA

Linkedin => Sam Hodges CPA

Facebook=>Sam Hodges Facebook Fan Page

Posted in Administration, Income/Franchise Tax, Michigan Business Tax, Sales and Use Tax, Single Business Tax | Leave a comment

Individual Income Tax – Michigan Apportionment for Trucking

Did a little research for a client CPA firm about how to apportion a flow through entity for Michigan individual income tax purposes.

In this case, individual return rules follow the SBT/MBT rules for apportioning income from a trade or business.  In this case, it uses the special revenue miles formula.

There are so many ways to look at this.  If you can’t think of any, let us know – whew amazing!!!

See this for more information or contact us if you have any questions.

http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(0oqoiybttja2narmwshp0oq3))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=mcl-206-132

Posted in Income/Franchise Tax | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Treasury Notice – Disregarded Entities MUST FILE Separate MBT

UPDATED JULY 24, 2011
Taxpayers had until June 30, 2011 to file their disregarded entity tax returns under the MBT, however, the Michigan Department of Treasury graciously has give YOU an extension until October 31, 2011.  Note, however, the technical fixes have been submitted including the fix that would not require this burdensome filing (since there won’t be any tax generated anyway.)  The Legislature is expected to pick up this legislation and move it when they return from their summer break – hopefully in time to take care of the whole fiasco…
In a recent notice – reproduced in part below – the Michigan Department of Treasury has put another stake in the ground indicating the K-Mart legislation fix regarding disregarded entities was not binding on the Michigan Business Tax.  Therefore, the clock is ticking for taxpayers to file ‘amended’ returns showing separate Single Member LLC or QSub entities.  Stay tuned for more!  Sam

NOTICE TO TAXPAYERS REGARDING FEDERALLY DISREGARDED ENTITIES AND THE MICHIGAN BUSINESS TAX

Requirement to File/Amend.

A person that is a disregarded entity for federal tax purposes, including a single member limited liability company or QSub, must file a separate return under the MBT or file as a member of a unitary business group if the requirements of MCL 208.1117(6) are satisfied.1 This requirement applies to all open tax periods under the MBT.

A person disregarded for federal tax purposes that filed as a sole proprietor, branch, or division of its owner for MBT purposes (a “previously disregarded entity”) is considered a non-filer for statute of limitations purposes under MCL 205.27a. A person that previously filed an MBT return that included one or more previously disregarded entities, including a unitary business group, must amend its returns for all open periods, even if the amended returns do not result in a different tax liability. A person required to file a return, or amend a return for a prior period, under this Notice must do so by January 31, 2011.Any FAQ or other form of guidance that states that an entity disregarded for federal tax purposes for a given taxable period must also file as a disregarded entity for MBT purposes is invalid to the extent inconsistent with this Notice.

Penalties and Interest.

Interest under MCL 205.23 and MCL 205.24 is due for any deficiencies in tax payments and shall be added to the tax from the time the tax was originally due. Interest on refunds due to amended returns or returns filed by previously disregarded entities shall be calculated and added to the refund commencing 45 days after the claim is filed.2

 

Yeah Public Act 305 (SB 369) fixed the Disregarded Entity Problem.

If an entity is disregarded for federal income tax purposes, it is to be disregarded for Michigan Business Tax purposes!  Unless you purposefully had previously set it up prior to this change.  So taxpayers are relieved they don’t have to file a bunch of useless returns!!!


Posted in Administration, Michigan Business Tax | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Michigan Business Tax – to fix or not to fix?

Well after considerable thought, it appears with a new Governor in Michigan there will obviously be some tax changes. However, it doesn’t matter who is in Lansing – business tax changes will not occur overnight.

As a matter of fact, it will take at least a year or possibly two in order to repeal the MBT and replace it with a whole new system. Making some minor or substantial changes to the existing MBT could happen before then though.

Again, the existing MBT was not designed to be easy. It was designed to give manufacturers in Michigan the upper hand.

Call us if you have any specific state and local tax questions – especially related to Michigan’s Business Tax. I specifically told L. Brooks Patterson and the existing Legislature to be careful what you ask for when he was pushing to repeal the Single Business Tax. Now taxpayers all over Michigan are saying – I wish they would not have done away with the SBT.

Now it is time to get real and have a “Come to Jesus” meeting as I call it.

Follow us on twitter: SamHodgesCPA, and Linkedin

Or you can call us by clicking this button

Posted in Administration, Michigan Business Tax, Single Business Tax | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

California changes service apportionment retroactive to 2008!

California amended their law sourcing apportionment in June 2010 but the change is made retroactive to 1-1-2008 which was the first year the proposed changes were issued.  It also corresponds to their 3-year statute of limitations.  This means 2008, 2009 and 2010 California tax returns will need to be prepared or amended using this new methodology.

Previously, California excluded agents and independent contractors from the calculation of ‘cost of performance’ which is the method the State uses to determine what state gets identified as the source of the revenue for apportionment purposes.

This meant the returns were previously prepared on the basis of using only internal costs incurred to source where the sales revenue went:  If customer was in CA, but the services were performed in MI – the cost of the salaries for those performing the service (excluding agents and independent contractors) would have all been in MI and the revenue for those services would be sourced to MI for apportionment purposes.  If, however, in order to gain that sale in CA, an agent in CA was paid an amount, under the revised law those costs must now go into the calculation of where to source the income.  It could and will change the tax paid in California and will require amended returns for those already filed.

If you would like, we can help research your specific circumstances in order to put your best foot forward.

Sam Hodges
Sam Hodges & Associates LLC
26400 Lahser Road, Suite 210
Southfield, Michigan 48033
(586) 764-4961 mobile
(248) 327-6430 office
(248) 327-6065 fax
Sam.Hodges@HodgesLLC.com
www.HodgesLLC.com

Thank you for your Business and Referrals!  For more information, you can connect with us on Twitter, Linkedin, Blog and our Facebook Page.

Twitter    => Sam Hodges CPA

Linkedin => Sam Hodges CPA

Facebook=>Sam Hodges Facebook Fan Page

Any tax advice contained in the body of this blog was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

Posted in Income/Franchise Tax | Tagged | Leave a comment

Michigan Business Tax Technical Corrections

The list of technical corrections that need to be made is growing very large.  So large, the MACPA has established a task force to help deliver the message to the MI Legislature.  In keeping with our Honest Broker philosophy  - who else would you turn to but your trusted CPA advisor.

Well, my first technical correction issue relates to the ordering of credits.  Did you know if a taxpayer has enough credits to wipeout their entire liability (including surcharge) and they have ITC recapture – which means they sold something that they took an ITC credit for before the item was fully depreciated – the forms ADD the liability to zero and the taxpayer has to pay!  Unbelievable.

My next one – and these are not in any order of significance or importance – is when a tax return is filed – payment must be made at the same time or it is considered LATE and the Department is assessing PENALTIES!!!   The statute reads in part:

208.1505 Annual or final return; date of filing; extension.

Sec. 505.

(1) An annual or final return shall be filed with the department in the form and content prescribed by the department by the last day of the fourth month after the end of the taxpayer’s tax year. Any final liability shall be remitted with this return. A taxpayer, other than a taxpayer subject to the tax imposed under chapter 2A or 2B, whose apportioned or allocated gross receipts are less than $350,000.00 does not need to file a return or pay the tax imposed under this act.

What isn’t exactly clear is – MBT forms must be filed electronically.  How are the payments going to be matched?  What happens if the return is filed early and the payment is made by the due date – IT’s LATE!!!  If you have this situation, please let us know.  We can help.

More technical corrections to come later.  Sam

Posted in Michigan Business Tax | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Michigan Business Tax – to fix or not to fix?

In my humble opinion, Michigan can have it’s cake and eat it too.

The MBT can and should be modified (in my opinion) to simplify and remove the many focused credits. It should be a “greater of” based tax – gross receipts OR income tax – whichever is greatest. And, the gross receipts portion should be more like the subtractive method of a true VAT (which allows for subtractions of inputs) with a much lower rate. This would still capture the out of state businesses profiting from Michigan business.

In addition, I would recommend removing all but about 4 of the credits. Phase in, Small Business, R&D, and ITC.

Last but not least, I would raise the filing threshold to $500k and those items that use that as the benchmark. Let’s face it. As I discussed with Debbie Dingel when I was a guest on her show “Am I Right”, she said – “Someone making $250k is not rich.” You can see it connected to our website: www.HodgesLLC.com

Sam

Posted in Administration, Michigan Business Tax | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Michigan Business Tax Small Business Alternate Credit

The MBTA contains a credit very similar to the Small Business Credit[1] and alternate tax contained in the Single Business Tax. The credit is designed to allow eligible businesses to pay a tax on income at a 1.8% rate.[2]

To qualify for the special tax treatment, the business must survive three disqualifiers.  Like the Single Business Tax, the three disqualifiers are gross receipts, adjusted business income and individual income. However, the disqualification amounts have been significantly increased.

The Small Business Credit is available to any taxpayer with gross receipts that do not exceed $20,000,000 and with adjusted business income minus the loss adjustment that does not exceed $1,300,000.[3] The gross receipts and the adjusted business income disqualifiers will be adjusted annually for inflation using the Detroit consumer price index.

The Small Business Credit is taken after the compensation credit, the investment tax credit and the research and development credit, but before all other credits.[4]

Distributive Share of Adjusted Business Income Disqualifier

An individual, a partnership, a limited liability company, or a subchapter S corporation is disqualified from taking the small business credit if the individual, any one partner of a partnership, any one member of a limited liability company, or any one shareholder of a subchapter S corporation receives more than $180,000 as a distributive share of the adjusted business income minus the loss adjustment.[5]

Corporation Shareholder and Officer Disqualifier

If the compensation paid to an individual shareholder of a “C” Corporation or officer of a “C” Corporation exceed $180,000, the “C” Corporation is disqualified from using the small business credit

Or

If the sum of the compensation and directors fees of a shareholder plus the shareholder’s percentage share of the “C” Corporation adjusted business income exceeds $180,000, the “C” Corporation is disqualified from using the small business credit.[6]

Phase Out of the Small Business Credit – Individual

The credit is phased out if the distributive share of adjusted business income for an individual, partner, member, shareholder or officer exceeds $160,000.[7]

$160,000 or less                                             0.0%

$160,000                     $165,000                     20%

$165,000                     $170,000                     40%

$170,000                     $175,000                     60%

$175,000                     $180,000                     80%

$180,000 or more                                           100%

Phase Out of the Small Business Credit – Gross Receipts

If gross receipts exceed $19,000,000, the credit is reduced by a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of gross receipts over $19,000,000 and the denominator of which is $1,000,000.  The credit cannot exceed 100% of the tax liability.[8]

There is no phase out of the adjusted business income disqualifier of $1,300,000.

The Small Business Credit Calculation

A taxpayer that qualifies for the Small Business Credit is allowed a credit against the MBT equal to the amount by which the tax imposed exceeds 1.8% of adjusted business income.[9]

Adjusted business income is business income plus the following:

(i)   Compensation and director’s fees of active shareholders of a corporation

(ii)  Carry back or carry forward of a net operating loss

(iii) Capital losses, and

(iv) Compensation and director’s fees of officers of a corporation.[10]

Tax Year Less Than Twelve Months

If the tax year is less than twelve months, the gross receipts disqualifier, the adjusted business income and share of business income disqualifiers shall be prorated.[11] The amount is multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months in the tax year and the denominator is 12.

Short Form Filing Option

If the taxpayer qualifies for the Small Business Credit without any of the reductions, they may file a short form return without a computation of the Michigan Business Tax.[12]

Professional Employer Organization (PEO)

If the taxpayer leases its officers and employees from a PEO, the compensation paid by the PEO to the taxpayer’s officers and employees is included in the taxpayer’s (client) tax return for Small Business Credit disqualification purposes.[13]

Loss Adjustment

A loss adjustment is used to reduce adjusted business income for the adjusted business income disqualifier ($1,300,000) and the individual, partner, shareholder disqualifier ($180,000).  The loss adjustment is used only to determine if the taxpayer is eligible for the Small Business Credit alternate tax calculation.  The credit calculation or alternate tax is based on adjusted business income before the loss adjustment.[14]

The loss adjustment is the amount by which adjusted business income was less than zero in any of the five years immediately preceding the tax year.  The negative adjusted business income is used only to the extent needed to qualify for the credit.  The taxpayer may not reuse negative adjusted business income.  The negative adjusted business income cannot be carried from a year in which no small business tax credit was claimed.


[1] MCL 208.36

[2] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(4) MCL 208.1417(4)

[3] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(1) MCL 208.1417(1)

[4] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(1) MCL 208.1417(1)

[5] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(1)(a) MCL 208.1417(1)(a)

[6] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(1)(b) MCL 208.1(417(1)(b)

[7] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(1)(c) MCL 208.1417(1)(c)

[8] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(5) MCL 208.1417(5)

[9] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(4) MCL 208.1(417(4)

[10] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(9)(b) MCL 208.1417(9)(b)

[11] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(6) MCL 208.1417(6)

[12] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(7) MCL 208.1417(7)

[13] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(8) MCL 208.1417(8)

[14] 2007 P.A. 36 §417(9)(d) MCL 208.1417(9)(d)

Posted in Michigan Business Tax | Leave a comment